Looking for more? 

We’re just an email away.

CrowdFarming

min

Published March 2026

The orange journey

Assessing the impact of the lifecycle of an orange

Climate change – largely affected by greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions – is a reality that threatens both communities and vulnerable sectors around the world. Among these, one of the most affected is none other than the agricultural sector and, with it, food security at global, regional and national levels.

Food production accounts for more than a quarter of global greenhouse gas emissions. While it is inevitable that we will produce this food for consumption, it is always possible to do so in a more sustainable and environmentally friendly way. If, as consumers, we want to contribute to the adoption of this type of model, we need viable, accessible and transparent purchasing alternatives in terms of the impact that our decisions are generating.  

With the intention of offering this alternative to CrowdFarmers – not only a fairer and more sustainable purchasing alternative, but also one that puts its impact into numbers – during 2022 we decided to conduct a study to quantify the real impact of the CrowdFarming model in terms of carbon footprint and food waste. The study took into account the journey of the orange from farm production to the consumer’s home, comparing it to the supermarket organic food supply chain.  For this, we started, of course, with one of our flagship products and the one that started it all: oranges.

By choosing organic products with a lower carbon footprint and less food waste, consumers – CrowdFarmers – become an active part of the shift towards a fairer and more sustainable agri-food chain. However, this does not mean that all the results are favourable for CrowdFarming. This study has also helped us to identify where we have room for improvement and to get down to work.



The study

For this initiative, the services of the specialised consultancy Hands On Impact were used to conduct the study and model the journey of 1 kg of oranges produced in Valencia (Spain) until they reach the customer’s home in Berlin (Germany).

To measure the impact of CrowdFarming, two categories were taken into account: at the environmental level – with the carbon footprint as the main indicator in kg of CO₂ emitted -, and food waste – expressed in kg of food wasted.

The scenarios

We considered two scenarios, along with their impact categories and stages (Figure 1): the CrowdFarming scenario and the supermarket scenario.

Figure 1. From A to F, supermarket Chain stages in Brown. From A to D CrowdFarming stages in green and orange.


Supermarket Scenario

The first step is a standard organic farm, for which data from scientific studies were taken as a reference, contrasted with other data from professional organic production associations (Ecovalia, 2022).

After harvesting, in this scenario, the oranges from the farm are transported to the post-harvest centre, where the product can remain artificially preserved for 4 days to 2 months, depending on the studies consulted. However, for this model, only a period of 15 days of storage in refrigerated chambers has been taken into account.
From the post-harvest centre and after a change of transport in Frankfurt (Germany) to smaller vehicles, the product is distributed to the warehouses of the supermarket, in this case studied, located in Berlin. The journey comes to an end when the consumer goes to the supermarket to do the shopping and the oranges arrive at home.

CrowdFarming Scenario

The starting point is a standard organic farm, so the same cultivation model is used as in the case of the supermarket. After the cultivation phase in the field, the preparation of the order takes place in CrowdLog*, our logistics centre in Valencia (Spain). The transport consists of the transfer of the oranges from the farm to CrowdLog, the export to Germany up to the transport exchange point in Speyer, from where the products are delivered to the final destination, in this case to the CrowdFarmer’s (consumer’s) home in Berlin.


In the case of CrowdFarming, the harvesting process and the journey of the produce to the CrowdFarmer’s home begins only when a CrowdFarmer places an order.  The farmer selling in CrowdFarming harvests on demand, which means that the oranges in CrowdFarming wait on the tree – not in cold storage. In this way, a CrowdFarming product will take on average 5.5 days to reach your home from the tree, in contrast to the supermarket model, where oranges can spend up to 2 months in cold storage.
In the case of supermarkets, we would also have to add the time it takes for the product to travel from Valencia to Berlin and the waiting time in other stores and supermarket shelves.

*Only farms close to the region of CrowdLog go through this logistic centre. For more information on CrowdLog please refer to our 2022 Impact Report.

Carbon footprint

Figure 2. LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) and carbon footprint of an orange through the supermarket supply chain model and CrowdFarming model


The carbon footprint (Figure 2) refers to the amount of greenhouse gases emitted during the production and distribution of a product, and is a key indicator of a company’s environmental impact.

We can see that the CO₂ emissions data for CrowdFarming equates to 0.74 kg CO₂ emitted throughout the entire supply chain; 22% less than the 0.95 kg CO₂ emitted in the supermarket supply chain.


In both cases, transport accounts for more than half of the total emissions, followed by agriculture, with packaging close behind in the CrowdFarming scenario alone. Let’s focus on what happens at these three stages and how the two scenarios compare.



Farming

For the comparison, we have used in both cases the average carbon footprint of 1 kg of organic oranges grown in Valencia, being as conservative as possible in the comparison. However, we have investigated the carbon footprint of the production phase on one of the farms selling through CrowdFarming. Emissions in this case were considerably lower than average: 0.04 kg CO₂ per kg of oranges compared to 0.14 kg CO₂ per kg of oranges on an average organic farm. This can be related to two main factors, the lower amount of inputs used in the case of the CrowdFarming farm and a higher than average production per hectare. 

The productivity of the CrowdFarming farm studied is 30 tonnes per hectare, while other studies report a productivity of 22-24 tonnes per hectare. 

This increase in productivity in the case of the farm studied with CrowdFarming may be due to certain dynamics that are avoided thanks to the direct sale model.  CrowdFarming avoids situations such as low farm-gate prices (those paid to the farmer) or large fluctuations in demand, which can cause farmers to leave part of their crops unharvested.  This unharvested fruit is not counted as food waste and is only reflected in a decrease in the total volume of production.

Although the results obtained on the CrowdFarming farm where data were collected were very good – or precisely because of that – it was decided to use data from a standard organic farm as a model in the study in both scenarios. In this way, it is avoided to assume that the rest of the CrowdFarming farmers’ farms have the same specific conditions. Furthermore, by using data from a standard organic farm in both scenarios, the differences between the supermarket and CrowdFarming supply chain can be measured more accurately, without allowing the type of crop to influence the results.


Transport from farm to table

Transport – including the last mile – is the factor that most influences the carbon footprint of oranges, accounting for around 70% of the total footprint. This is mainly due to the long distances that Valencian oranges travel to Berlin. 

Although transport is a relevant factor in both scenarios, we have found that CrowdFarming’s efficiency efforts result in a 22% reduction of the emissions produced compared to the supermarket model. This reduction in emissions is directly related to both the high occupancy of the trucks responsible for transporting the produce – which travelled on average at 93% of their capacity during 2022 – and the reduction in food waste during the supply chain. The food waste we see in the supermarket scenario translates into more resources being used to produce and transport oranges that will end up in the trash.

In addition to these factors that we have taken into account for the efficiency of the CrowdFarming model, additional initiatives are undertaken to reduce the carbon footprint of our shipments. Firstly, companies such as Trucksters allow for constant movement of produce through driver relays, which significantly reduces the time the oranges remain refrigerated in the trucks that transport them. Last mile carriers are also being sought that offer sustainable alternatives, such as electric delivery. Finally, and as a last resort, an extra price is paid to offset the carbon footprint. In total, 65% of CrowdFarming’s last mile shipments are offset. However, this additional reduction and these compensation measures are not included in our calculations of the journey of 1 kg of oranges.



Packaging

In the case of the supermarket supply chain, only packaging used to ship large volumes of product to the supermarket has been taken into account, and not packaging used to sell the product to the consumer. We are referring to packaging that can be seen on supermarket shelves, such as plastic nets or citrus bags – which could increase the carbon footprint by more than 8%.

We also wanted to be conservative when calculating the carbon footprint of the packaging used by CrowdFarming by considering one of the least efficient formats offered by our model – 5 kg instead of 10 or 15 kg formats – as transporting smaller volumes increases the ratio of packaging used per kilo of product.

In addition, CrowdFarming encourages farmers to avoid the use of plastics for packaging produce, except in cases where food safety is compromised. In the case of oranges, only compostable materials, i.e. cardboard, are used.

Food waste

Figure 3. Percentage of food waste generated in the production of 25 oranges along the supermarket supply chain (in brown; 5.5 out of 25 oranges, 22% of the total), and the CrowdFarming model (in green; 0.25 out of 25 oranges, 3% of the total).


Food waste is a significant contributor to climate change, accounting for approximately 8-10% of global greenhouse gas emissions, equivalent to the emissions generated by the entire transport sector.


We have found that, in the supermarket supply chain, for every 100 kg that reaches consumers’ homes, 30 more are produced and wasted before reaching their final destination. In contrast, in the CrowdFarming scenario, less than 3 kg of oranges would be wasted due to food safety issues (e.g. rotten produce) for every 100 kg that reach consumers’ homes.


When food is wasted, all the resources used to produce it are also wasted, including water, energy, land and fertilisers. In addition, the resulting waste generates large amounts of greenhouse gases when it decomposes in landfills, even more so when it is food waste. Since we are focusing on the environmental impact, we will not go into the enormous social and economic impact of global food waste, although one can imagine that this issue is immensely relevant if we are to create a supply chain that is not only sustainable, but also fair.


This study has served to test the hypothesis on which much of the CrowdFarming model is based: we present an alternative to the way things are traditionally done in supermarkets, reducing food waste and carbon footprint. It has also served to focus our attention on those aspects we need to improve: supporting farmers to go beyond organic, finding alternative forms of transport and packaging, and making consumers aware of the impact of each of their actions. Finally, we believe that this experience has further increased our thirst for knowledge, transparency and self-criticism.

Written by Fran Aparicio

Fran Aparicio

Fran Aparicio coordinates Regenerative Agriculture at CrowdFarming, which mostly means he spends his days trying to make farmers, scientists and data people agree on what “healthy soil” actually means. He lives somewhere between muddy boots and research papers, translating field reality into something you can measure (and hopefully improve).

Share this content:

Keep digging ...

CrowdFarming

9 min

The “why meat” question

The path to a truly regenerative agricultural system often unfolds in unexpected ways. For many of our organic farmers, the journey began with the adoption of cover crops – plants grown not primarily for harvest, but to protect and enrich the soil. However, managing these cover crops, especially in complex landscapes like the terraced avocado groves of Southern Spain or the undulating terrain of vineyards where machinery access is limited, presented a new challenge. It was in seeking solutions that these farmers rediscovered an ancient ally: livestock.Animals, they found, were remarkably adept at managing these “weeds” and cover crops. But the benefits didn’t stop there. The integration of livestock brought with it a cascade of positive ecological effects. Their manure provides a natural source of fertiliser, rich in nutrients and organic matter, steadily improving soil health. The gentle disturbance of their hooves can help to break up compacted soil surfaces and tread seeds into the ground, aiding germination and plant diversity. As they graze, they trample plant matter, creating a natural mulch that protects the soil from erosion and helps retain moisture. Furthermore, animals can carry seeds in their coats and digestive tracts, contributing to the dispersal of plant species and enhancing biodiversity – a process known as zoochory. In essence, livestock became active partners in regenerating the land, contributing not only to soil health but also supporting greater biodiversity, including vital pollinators feeding on diverse pastures and increased soil microbe and earthworm populations benefiting from organic matter cycling.This rediscovery, however, highlighted another pressing issue: the scarcity of shepherds and skilled livestock managers. For generations, shepherds were the stewards of the land, guiding their flocks in a way that benefited both animals and ecosystems. Yet, a confluence of factors – including the rise of intensive farming systems, challenging economic returns from traditional sheep and goat products, the demanding lifestyle, shifting land use policies, and an ageing rural population – has led to a sharp decline in their numbers. This presented a quandary. How could we, at CrowdFarming, encourage the vital integration of livestock into regenerative systems if the very people skilled in managing them were disappearing? Or, if farm managers took on herd management themselves, how could we ignore a potential avenue to support their livelihoods, especially when it aligns so seamlessly with our model of direct connection?However, these pioneering farmers often face considerable challenges. They navigate the competitive pressures of intensive farming, the financial investment required for organic certification, and restricted access to markets that genuinely recognise and reward their dedication to superior environmental and animal welfare standards.These experiences and observations have culminated in a new step for CrowdFarming. Driven by our commitment to supporting farmers who are at the forefront of regenerative and organic practices, we are introducing responsibly sourced meat products as an evolution of our current model. By creating a stable and direct sales channel, we aim to bolster the economic viability of these farmers, supporting their transition towards, or their ability to continue, these regenerative and organic farming systems.And we are taking this step after much reflection and debate. Debate both internal and external, with people who support us in this decision and others who would have preferred we didn’t make it. I want to extend a special thanks to the group of vegans working at CrowdFarming for engaging in such constructive discussions and for presenting a well-reasoned perspective.This is a matured decision that we are making resolutely, convinced that moderate consumption of meat from farmers who share our values can help us build a more sustainable food supply chain.Who makes the cutThe producers participating in this new initiative will be certified organic (or in the process of converting to organic certification), their animals will be predominantly pasture-fed, and the farms will be actively implementing measurable regenerative agricultural practices.For those unfamiliar with the terminology, it is important to clarify these terms: Organic Farming: Within the European Union, stringent regulations govern organic farming. These mandate that animals are predominantly reared outdoors with ample space, receive feed from organic sources, and that the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is prohibited. Furthermore, there are strict limitations on the application of antibiotics and other veterinary treatments. These organic principles, combined with our pasture-feeding requirements, inherently exclude intensive practices such as continuous indoor confinement or feedlot finishing. Pasture-Fed: A significant portion of the EU’s organic agricultural land, approximately 44%, consists of permanent pasture. If this pasture is managed regeneratively, the opportunity to generate a positive impact on the environment is considerable. For herbivorous animals (e.g., cattle, sheep) in this initiative, their diet will consist of 100% grass and forage from these pastures. For omnivorous animals (e.g., pigs), a minimum of 70% of their diet will be pasture-based, with the remainder being certified organic supplementary feed. Crucially, the definition of pasture and forage under these standards excludes common intensive feed ingredients like grains (maize, wheat, barley), soya meal, grain legumes (peas, beans), and specific industrial by-products. Regenerative Agriculture: For CrowdFarming, this represents a commitment beyond standard organic practices, focusing on actively improving the farm ecosystem. It describes a holistic approach where the primary focus is restoring and enhancing soil health, increasing biodiversity, and improving water cycles. Livestock farmers participating in this initiative adhere to organic principles (or are in conversion), meet our pasture-fed standards, and follow the Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) protocol of CrowdFarming’s Regenerative Agriculture Program. This ensures practices lead to quantifiable positive outcomes, which are monitored and made public through our Regeneration Index. Key practices often include rotational grazing, which mimics the natural movement of wild herds allowing pastures periods of rest and recovery, preventing overgrazing and promoting soil regeneration, as well as fostering diverse pastures.   Transparency is an unwavering principle at the heart of the CrowdFarming model. The authenticity of the farming practices for this new meat offering will be assured through several robust layers of verification: The official EU organic certification. An internal protocol, overseen by our agronomic teams, to ensure adherence to minimum levels of pasture-feeding. The Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) framework integral to CrowdFarming’s Regeneration Index. Clearing the air: Methane, CO2 and N2OConversations about livestock farming inevitably involve greenhouse gases, and some of the first arguments often include cows’ burps (against) or the ability of pastures to sequester carbon (for). It’s not as black and white, and it’s crucial to address this openly and accurately.Methane: Ruminant animals produce methane through digestion. Unlike carbon dioxide (CO2), which persists and accumulates in the atmosphere for centuries, methane is a potent but “short-lived” gas, breaking down in about 10–12 years: which means it doesn’t have the same warming effect as CO2. While global methane levels require significant reduction across all sectors (including fossil fuels and landfill), climate science indicates that eliminating agricultural methane entirely isn’t necessary to stabilise temperatures. Strategies compatible with pasture-based systems, such as improving animal health, selective breeding for lower emissions, and potentially optimising forage diversity, offer pathways for sustainable reduction.  Carbon Sequestration: Well-managed grasslands and integrated systems with trees (agroforestry) have the potential to draw down CO2 from the atmosphere and store it as carbon in soils and biomass. While the exact amount and long-term permanence of sequestration is complex and varies greatly depending on soil type, climate, and management history, focusing on these practices contributes positively to soil health and ecosystem resilience, even beyond the carbon benefit. CrowdFarming focuses on verifying these practices known to build soil health, rather than making specific farm-level carbon negativity claims, which remain challenging to substantiate definitively year-on-year.  Nitrous Oxide (N2O): A long-lived and potent greenhouse gas, N2O emissions in agriculture are strongly linked to the use of synthetic nitrogen fertilisers and manure management. By requiring organic certification (eliminating synthetic fertilisers) and favouring pasture-based systems (reducing manure concentration), our approach inherently lowers N2O risks compared to intensive models. Furthermore, integrating nitrogen-fixing legumes like clover into pastures can significantly reduce or eliminate the need for external nitrogen inputs, further mitigating N2O emissions.Offering a better alternativeThis initiative extends beyond merely introducing a new product category. Its core purpose is to provide tangible economic support to farmers who are leading the charge in ecological and regenerative livestock systems. By establishing this direct channel, we aim to furnish them with a degree of predictable income, thereby strengthening their financial stability and enhancing their capacity to maintain and expand practices that yield substantial benefits for our shared ecosystems.We understand and respect that individuals choose vegetarian or vegan lifestyles for a variety of environmental and ethical reasons, and there’s many of us in CrowdFarming following this way of life. Indeed, major scientific bodies like the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have highlighted that shifts towards balanced diets, including a reduction in the overall consumption of animal-sourced foods – particularly those from high-emission systems – can contribute significantly to mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and lessening environmental pressures. However, many people continue to include animal products in their diet and are actively seeking high-quality meat that aligns with their values regarding animal welfare and environmental stewardship. This search for quality is supported by research indicating nutritional differences in the resulting meat and dairy. Studies have shown that products from animals raised predominantly on pasture, compared to those fed grain-concentrate diets, tend to have higher levels of beneficial omega-3 fatty acids, a more favourable omega-6 to omega-3 ratio, higher levels of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), and higher concentrations of certain vitamins like E and some B vitamins. For these consumers, finding and verifying products from farmers employing robust organic, pasture fed and truly regenerative methods often remains a significant hurdle.We view this initiative as a significant opportunity to raise awareness among consumers about the positive impacts of well-managed, integrated livestock within regenerative organic agriculture. It also serves to highlight the distinction between these farming models and other systems that can have more detrimental environmental and animal welfare outcomes. We are convinced that by fostering a deeper understanding and providing direct access to these thoughtfully produced products, we can play a part in encouraging more farmers to embrace these beneficial philosophies of land stewardship. It also empowers consumers to make informed decisions about the origin and production methods of their food.This expansion is a carefully considered evolution for CrowdFarming, reinforcing our unwavering commitment to forging an agri-food chain that is more fair, sustainable and resilient. By providing direct access to meat from farms adhering to these rigorous organic, pasture-fed, and verified regenerative standards, we empower consumers to make informed choices that directly support farmers investing in animal welfare and ecosystem health. We are enthusiastic about embarking on this new chapter with our community of consumers and farmers.

Read

CrowdFarming

min

Rethinking the journey

At CrowdFarming, we often talk about soil health, biodiversity, and regenerative practices on the farm. But what happens once the harvest leaves the field? The journey from the farmer to your doorstep is a critical piece of the puzzle. In this article, you’ll learn: Why the “middle mile” is the biggest source of emissions in our logistics chain. What HVO is and why we’ve chosen it over other alternatives like electrification. How our partnership with Trucksters is making our longest routes cleaner. The real, certified impact this change has had on our carbon footprint since late 2024. 1. The elephant in the lorry: Our biggest carbon challengeIn the world of logistics, much of the recent innovation has focused on the “last mile”—the final delivery to your home. It makes sense; this is the part of the journey consumers see, with electric vans and cargo bikes becoming common sights in our cities. But the real giant in terms of emissions is the “middle mile”: the long-haul journey that takes thousands of boxes from farms and regional hubs across Europe to distribution centres before entering the last stage of home delivery.To put it in perspective, a Life Cycle Assessment we conducted on oranges traveling from Valencia (Spain) to Berlin (Germany) revealed that transport is the single largest contributor to their carbon footprint, accounting for around 70% of total emissions. The middle mile alone accounted for 47% of the total carbon footprint from farm to fork. While farming practices and packaging matter, the long road between the field and the final distribution hub is where our biggest impact lies. For years, this has been our biggest operational challenge. As Javier Sanjurjo, CEO of CrowdLog — CrowdFarming’s logistic company —, explains, “We are always looking to reduce our environmental impact, from agricultural practices to the final delivery. The middle mile was where we saw the most room for improvement.”2. The search for a solution: Beyond the electric dreamOur first instinct was to explore electrification. The idea of silent, zero-emission trucks is compelling. However, the reality of heavy electric transport in Europe is, for now, a complicated dream.“We explored electrifying our routes,” says Javier, “but the hurdles were immense. The initial investment in charging infrastructure was sky-high, and the operational reality of taking a truck off the road for up to 11 hours to charge just isn’t viable for a supply chain that needs to be agile.” This is where our partner, Trucksters, came in. While continuing to test electric options, they presented a more immediate, scalable, and powerful solution: HVO.3. HVO: Turning used cooking oil into a cleaner journeySo, what exactly is HVO?HVO stands for Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil. It’s a premium-quality biofuel that can be used in conventional diesel engines without any modifications. Crucially, we use second-generation HVO, which is produced from waste materials like used cooking oil.“The emissions’ reduction is massive,” explains Alvaro Guerreiro, International Sales Manager at Trucksters. “A normal truck emits around 2.2 tons of CO₂ on a long-haul trip. With second-generation HVO, we reduce those emissions by up to 90%.” Unlike electrification, HVO requires no new infrastructure, has no range limitations, and can be implemented immediately. It represents a pragmatic and powerful step forward. While it’s still more expensive than conventional diesel, as Javier puts it, “from a sustainability perspective, it’s not expensive at all.”It’s important to note that while the second-generation HVO we use (from waste products) is a powerful tool, it is not a silver bullet for the entire industry. The global supply of used cooking oil is finite, and the broader debate around biofuels remains complex. This is especially true for first-generation biofuels, which are made from agricultural crops grown specifically for fuel (like palm, soy, or rapeseed oil). The use of these crops raises critical questions about land use—often referred to as the ‘food vs. fuel’ debate—as it can compete with food production and potentially drive deforestation. For us, focusing on second-generation HVO is a crucial and effective transitional technology that allows us to act now, while we continue to explore and support future innovations in sustainable transport.4. How we guarantee the impact: The mass balance systemWhen a truck fills up with HVO, how do we ensure that the emissions’ reduction is correctly attributed to CrowdFarming’s deliveries and not double-counted?The risk of double-counting in this context refers to the risk of a logistics provider assigning the same batch of sustainable fuel, and its corresponding CO₂ reduction, to two different clients. For example, if a provider buys 1,000 litres of HVO, they could fraudulently sell the environmental benefit of those 1,000 litres to Client A and to Client B, effectively claiming twice the impact that was actually achieved.To prevent this, the entire process is managed through a certified system called Mass Balance Accounting. This system works like a transparent digital inventory: Audited Supply: The fuel provider, Cepsa, certifies every litre of HVO that Trucksters purchases. Tracked Consumption: Trucksters uses a platform called SQUAKE to track every kilometre driven for CrowdFarming and calculates the exact amount of HVO consumed. This inventory is meticulously managed to prevent double-counting. Certified Reduction: Finally, an independent body, TÜV, audits this data and issues an official certificate detailing the exact CO₂ reduction achieved. “This strict, three-step audited process gives us and our clients complete confidence,” says Alvaro. “They can be sure the impact is real.”5. The results: Our impact since the beginning of our HVO journeyWe began transitioning our main route from Museros, Spain, to Speyer, Germany, in the last quarter of 2024. The results have been immediate and significant. In the final months of 2024, 21 full truckloads were powered by HVO. This shift has already allowed us to avoid approximately 34.5 tonnes of CO₂e. Our goal is to continue expanding the use of HVO across all our routes with Trucksters and to encourage our other logistics partners to adopt this technology. “It’s not crazy to think that we can cut our middle-mile carbon footprint in half,” says Javier. “Which is huge.”Conclusion: From offsetting to actively avoidingFor years, the logistics industry has relied on carbon offsetting—planting trees to compensate for emissions. While well-intentioned, this approach doesn’t tackle the problem at its source.Our switch to HVO represents a fundamental shift in strategy: from offsetting to actively avoiding emissions. By investing in cleaner fuels and smarter logistics, we are proving that a more sustainable supply chain isn’t just an abstract goal—it can be built into the very way we move food.This is a journey, and it’s not without its challenges. As Alvaro notes, widespread adoption requires a “mindset change” from manufacturers, insurers, institutions, and truck drivers themselves. At CrowdFarming, we see our role as finding and supporting these solutions, while engaging others to take the same route. By supporting pioneers like Trucksters, we are helping to accelerate a much-needed transformation in the transport sector.

Read