Looking for more? 

We’re just an email away.

Regenerative farming

min

Published March 2026

Organic production in the European Union (I): current outlook and regulatory developments

Disclaimer: This article is intended to disclose verified information with which anyone can form their own opinion on the subject discussed below.



General data on organic production in the European Union 

Since the 1960s and 1970s when organic farming in Europe began to take shape, demand has grown to become a 30.7 billion euro market by 2016. The cultivated area has also been growing and in the last decade has increased by 70% reaching almost 7% of the total agricultural area of the EU in 2017 and accounting for 18% of the world’s organic agricultural area. Within the European Union, the largest producer is Spain with 16.6%, followed by Italy with 15.2% and France with 13.9%. Germany ranks fourth with 9% (2017 data). 

A graph of the top countries with the largest area of organic food production

Despite the increase in the area dedicated to organic production, we must not lose sight of the fact that nearly 45% of it are permanent pastures. A fact that hangs over the heads of producers who doubt whether or not to switch to organic farming is that in organic farming the yield can be reduced between 15% and 60% compared to a conventional crop. At the time of making the decision, one of the variables analyzed by producers is whether the drop in yield can be offset by a higher selling price. 

There is a paradox in the European Union that the countries with the largest area dedicated to organic farming are not its main consumers since Germany with 9,500 million euros and France with 6,700 million are the main consumers of organic produce in the EU. Today, Europe is the second-largest consumer of organic products after the USA. 



Summary of the legal situation of EC in the Union: current regulations and amendments for 2021


Organic production in the European Union is regulated and controlled to ensure that all member countries have the same obligations and opportunities. The EU sets the rules of the game in the following regulations:

  1. Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labeling of organic products

  2. Commission Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation

  3. Regulation (EU) 2017/625 on official controls performed to ensure the application of food and feed law

  4. Reglamento (UE) 2018/848 – new organic production regulation (from 2021)


Consumer confidence is crucial in the organic food market. Consumers need to be confident that they are buying a product that meets their expectations, and that is why we need an organization that englobes and defines the legal framework for producers and consumers. 


The harmonization of criteria is key to avoid possible confusion for the consumer when buying an organic product. In other words, the consumer has to know that the organic seal guarantees that the regulations have been complied with regardless of the country where the product comes from. In the 2007 regulation, the main objective was harmonization, but the EU is also aware of the enormous agro-climatic diversity that exists in European territories. Therefore, it took a more flexible approach in order to “allow ecological standards and requirements to be adapted to local climate or geographical conditions, to different agricultural practices and stages of development”, always “within the limits of specific conditions established in Community legislation” (see Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007).

In other words, the Member States could allow certain actions, but no one can bypass the rules on organic production. An example of an exception would be the use of “demarcated beds” in Sweden, Finland and Denmark as the National Certification Authorities have permitted their use even though in the 2007 regulation it was specifically regulated that the crop should be linked to the soil. Other exceptions refer to the use of non-organic plant material when no certified organic material has been found; or to the use of a certain component in the preparation of food in a temporary manner since the equivalent component in organic is not available. 


The new legislation, which will enter into force in January 2021, aims to further harmonize production criteria, eliminating derogations, and to control products at all links in the chain. While a better control is being considered, the aim is to reduce the bureaucracy to which farmers are subjected, which means that the EU has a major challenge in finding this balance. In the coming months, we will see what specific provisions this regulation is translated into. 

Illustration ECO CrowdFarming



What changes in the new regulations?


Fewer controls on excellent producers: For the producers that have had a clean record after three consecutive years, controls can be made every two years instead of annually. 

The removal of exceptions: the derogations that had been granted will be progressively eliminated and the framework for new derogations to be minimal, consensual and temporary is established. 

New products: salt, cork or essential oils will have their place in the regulations.

Simplification for farmers: group certification is created for small producers. 

Mixed farms: as long as they are clearly differentiated and delimited, it will be allowed that on the farm there is part organic and part conventional. It is intended that farmers are encouraged to try with part of the farm and not all at once. 

Same import conditions: farmers outside the EU will have to meet the same criteria to export their products to the EU. Instead of establishing equivalences, the principle of conformity will prevail and it will be the EU that establishes it instead of each member state. 

This new regulation was set with very ambitious harmonization objectives and has had to be adjusted throughout the negotiations held for several years until its approval in November 2017. The ratification with votes against by countries such as Finland, Austria or the Czech Republic, and the abstention of Germany and Belgium, gives an idea of how difficult and controversial this new regulation is. 

Note: this article has a second part where we analyze if the regulation of the ecological seal is the same in all countries.


Written by Juan Plasencia

Juan Plasencia

Share this content:

Keep digging ...

Regenerative farming

5 min

Why is growing organic stone fruit so risky?

Understanding the risks of growing stone fruit is key to appreciating why peaches, apricots, and nectarines are so complex to cultivate under an organic and regenerative agricultural model. Their short growing cycle, high sensitivity to weather conditions, and limited post-harvest lifespan create a scenario where precision and timing are critical factors.Why is the stone fruit growing season so short?Most summer stone fruits complete their entire development cycle, from blossom to harvest, in under ten weeks. This rapid evolution drastically reduces the margin for error for the farmer. The window for an optimal harvest is not only brief but also highly variable, depending on the speed of ripening and meteorological events.Increasing climate volatility in Europe adds a layer of unpredictability. A specific example can be found in the region of Catalonia, where organic stone-fruit farmer Jordi Garreta explained how this year’s prolonged spring rains interfered with the fruit set and final ripening, affecting the available harvest volumes. Furthermore, several hailstorms damaged and split some of the fruit.Each variety presents specific vulnerabilities: Cherries are prone to splitting with sudden rains. Apricots are particularly sensitive to thermal stress. Peaches are highly vulnerable to fungal diseases in high-humidity conditions. A regenerative and organic approach to the risks of growing stone fruit Farmer Jordi Garreta, Grup Garreta Farm, Spain In conventional agriculture, the control of pests and diseases often relies on the use of synthetic inputs. The organic and regenerative approach, however, seeks to create a resilient ecosystem, addressing the root cause of pests — an unbalanced ecosystem that allows excessive growth of a specific organism  —  instead of the consequences. As Jordi Garreta explains: “The main pests and diseases are aphids, earwigs (Forficula auricularia), and fungi like Monilia and Rhizopus. The best way to combat them is to have a crop that is well-balanced in its nutrition, meaning that each tree uses its own tools to fight off pests. If this is not enough, we use kaolin, nettle slurry, or diatomaceous earth. We plant flower strips and allow spontaneous wild herbs to grow to encourage biodiversity, which creates a more resilient ecosystem against pests, among other benefits.” Jordi Garreta Farmer at Grup Garreta Scientific research supports these practices. For example, a 2022 study found that tree rows closest to perennial flower strips averaged a 60% increase of predators per branch, compared to those found in control orchards without flower strips. These methods not only addresses pests in the short term, but also prioritises the long-term health of the soil and the ecosystem, which ends up paying back by increasing the ecosystem’s resilience.What are climacteric fruits, and how does it affect their flavour?Most stone fruits (with the exception of cherries) are climacteric, meaning they continue to ripen after being picked, thanks to the internal production of ethylene. While this allows farmers to ship fruit that is still firm, it demands precise timing. Harvesting too early results in flavourless fruit; harvesting too late makes transport difficult, especially in organic farming where many chemical preservatives and treatments are prohibited.Post-harvest losses are one of the biggest challenges facing the food system. According to the FAO, fruits and vegetables suffer the highest loss rates, exceeding 20% ​​globally before even reaching stores. Within this category, delicate and perishable fruits such as stone fruit are particularly vulnerable to mechanical damage and over-ripening, specially given the high temperatures in the season in which they are harvested and shipped.This is where production models diverge significantly: The conventional model: The food industry has adapted to these biological limits through early harvesting, cold storage, and prioritising varieties selected for their durability rather than their organoleptic (smell and flavour) qualities. Supermarkets often pressure producers to deliver uniform, long-lasting products at low prices. This model depends on an intensive cold chain and production surpluses, which typically ends up in high food waste and comes at the expense of flavour and nutritional density. It is estimated that stone-fruit losses from farm to table can range from 20 to 50% globally.  The direct sales model: By harvesting on demand, the fruit is picked at its point of physiological maturity, prolonged cold storage is avoided, and overproduction is reduced. This not only minimises food waste but also preserves the product’s integrity and allows for fairer pricing structures that reflect the high risk and labour intensity required to grow these fruits without synthetic inputs. A practical guide to at-home conservationOnce the fruit arrives at your home, its proper handling is essential to enjoy its maximum quality. Ripen at room temperature: If your peaches, nectarines, or apricots are still firm, leave them at room temperature, away from direct sunlight. To know if a peach or apricot is ripe, the key is not always the colour, but the touch and the aroma. You will know they are ready when they yield slightly to a gentle press and give off a fragrant aroma. Refrigerate after ripening: Once ripe, you can move them to the fridge to extend their life for a few more days. Low temperatures (especially below 8 °C) can impair the development of flavour and texture in fruit that has not yet ripened. The case of cherries: As they are non-climacteric, cherries do not ripen after harvesting. They should be refrigerated immediately to maintain their freshness. Wash just before eating: Avoid washing the fruit before storing it, as moisture can accelerate its decay. Wash it just before you intend to eat it. To know more about how to handle your summer fruit, here you have a specific article to guide you through.Towards a resilient model for a vulnerable sector Farmer Anita Minisci, Azienda Agricola San Mauro, Italy The combination of short seasons, high climate sensitivity, and market pressures are the main risks of growing stone fruit, making summer stone fruit production one of the most complicated sectors of organic fruit farming. As climate volatility increases, producers will face greater uncertainty. Supporting producers through transparent and direct supply chains is not just a consumer preference; it is an essential shift to sustain production models that prioritise soil health, quality nutrition, and long-term resilience. 

Read

Regenerative farming

min

Why is making farmers visible key to scaling Regenerative-Organic agriculture?

What if everyone could name their favourite farmer? We can often name our favourite chefs, dream to visit their restaurants, or buy their cookbooks. But when asked to name a single farmer, many draw a blank. This anonymity isn’t just a symptom of a broken food system—it’s one of its root causes. To scale regenerative-organic agriculture and make it the industry standard, we need more than new practices; we need new role models. This was a key discussion point on our podcast episode with Analisa Winther, co-founder of Top 50 Farmers.The Imperative to Scale Regenerative Farming Regenerative-organic agriculture encompasses farming principles and practices designed to restore and enhance the farm’s entire ecosystem. It prioritises improving soil health, optimising water cycles, increasing biodiversity, and sequestering carbon, ultimately aiming to produce nutrient-dense food while working in harmony with nature.Currently, such regenerative practices are implemented on approximately 15% of global cropland. According to World Economic Forum, to meet climate goals and ensure food system resilience, this figure ideally needs to increase to 40% by 2030.  The way Winther see’s it, one way to encourage regenerative farming expansion is to bring top farmers to the spotlight. Launched in 2025, Top 50 Farmers was inspired by how the gastronomy world transformed chefs into celebrities. Now, the focus shifts from the food we eat and its cooking techniques, to what that food eats: the nutrients in the soil, and the regenerative practices that generate it. The first cohort of farmers ranges from 26 to 70 years old, with farms stretching from a half hectare to 4,000 hectares in size.Too often, regenerative agriculture is perceived as young, modern, small-scale: niche. This can alienate the very farmers we need to engage: the ones who have worked the land for decades, often in conventional systems, who are curious and considering change but may be unsure how to begin their transition.  By amplifying stories across generations, scales, and methods, Top 50 Farmers offers a vision of a regenerative movement that is inclusive, grounded and real.Why does visibility matter?Visibility has tangible economic consequences. When farmers become household names, the value of their produce—and the standards behind it—gain weight. Visibility can lead to policy influence, new markets, and stronger community ties.It also breaks the cycle of anonymity that enables disconnection and devaluation within the food system. As Cristina, our Head of Impact and podcast co-host, put it, “When you’re a farmer that is producing for anonymous consumers through big channels like supermarkets, you’re not necessarily held accountable. It’s very unlikely the consumer will ever be able to trace the product back to you.” But with a name, a face, and a story, the relationship changes, there is commitment and accountability from both sides. Consumers commit to paying fair prices, accepting produce that doesn’t come in standard shapes and sizes, and  farmers commit to delivering the best quality and staying true to their word — they can now be held accountable. The result is a deeper trust and understanding, longer relationships (like adoptions), and eventually better food and more sustainable farming practices. “That’s exactly why models like direct sales, adoption programmes, or agro-tourism matter. They aren’t just marketing tools. They are vehicles for building long-term, reciprocal commitment.” – Analisa WitherRegeneration is a journey, not a destinationAlthough at CrowdFarming we do have our definition of what regenerative agriculture is and how it coexists with the organic certification, there is no consensus across the industry for what makes a farm “regenerative.” There are no red lines, and that’s part of the challenge—and the strength—of the movement.Analisa reminded us that “regenerative is not a destination. It is a mindset, a philosophy, and an approach”. Farmers in the Top 50 are at different points in their journey—some just starting out, others continuing multi-generational practices. What unites them is a willingness to learn, adapt and build with nature. The focus isn’t on perfection, but on direction. The community created allows them to connect, and share their progress. And as we’ve figured out by now, there is no better way to learn about something than to talk about it to somebody who has tried it before you.The path forward: Inspiration and infrastructureOur shared long-term vision is bold but necessary: “Regenerative-organic agriculture will be the industry standard once again”. That will require not only cultural shifts but systemic support. More farmer-focused policies. Better access to knowledge. Tools for financing and cooperation.And visibility.Because the more we see the people who grow our food—not as faceless suppliers but as innovators, entrepreneurs, and role models—the more we understand what’s at stake. Because if the diverse mix of farmers from each cohort gains the confidence to go back to their communities and share what they’ve learned in their journey, that might get the mind shift started for others. “We’re not trying to crown the ‘best’ farmer. There is no best. What matters is showing the breadth of ways people are already regenerating—on a half-hectare in Lithuania or on 4,000 hectares in France. What matters is shining a spotlight, so others can see themselves in the story.” – Analisa Wither

Read